Skip to content

Omegon Pro UHC 1.25 in review

A 1.25 in UHC filter from Omegon’s Pro range, sold on the contrast improvement it brings to nebula observing, with no wavelengths published.

The bottom line A filter sold entirely on the experience it promises, with no number anywhere to hold it to.

The description is a story

The listing describes an object glimmering faintly at the edge of visibility, and then the filter making it clear. That is an accurate account of what a UHC filter does on an emission nebula, and it is the whole of the technical content.

What a buyer would need

The wavelengths passed, and the transmission at each. Those two together define a filter completely, and this listing contains neither. One of the three UHC filters on this shelf publishes its lines; this is not that one.

The word “Pro”

It names a range within a catalogue. It is not a specification, it is not a standard, and it does not constrain the passband in any way.

What it will and will not do

On emission nebulae from a light-polluted site, it will raise contrast. On galaxies and clusters it will not, because they emit across the spectrum and so does the sky behind them. Nothing gets brighter under any filter.

Availability

German, French, Italian and Spanish Amazon stores ran from 63 € to 66 € on the day of the survey.

British Amazon store lists it in local currency, which the euro range above sets aside.

American Amazon catalogue holds a record for it that nobody is selling.

Figures as Keepa reported them on the day this page was last updated. Stock and pricing shift without warning.

Prices quoted in this text were read on 17 September 2026. The live price is at the top of the page.

What it publishes, and what it withholds

Strengths

  • The maker describes the right effect: contrast on objects at the threshold of visibility
  • A 1.25 in thread fits every standard eyepiece barrel
  • Sold within a named range rather than as an anonymous part

Compromises

  • No wavelengths, no transmission percentage and no bandwidth of any kind
  • The listing is written as narrative prose with no specification at all
  • Being in a “Pro” range is a marketing position, not a figure

Specifications

Bandpass and typeUHC — a market convention, not a published standard · The listing gives none: no wavelengths and no transmission percentage appear
Line transmissionNot published by the maker.
Blocking outside the bandNot published by the maker.
Thread size1.25 in
Glass flatnessNot published by the maker.
CoatingsNot published by the maker.
Amazon referenceB016O65QS4 (same reference on 6 Amazon marketplaces)
EAN4049467472889

What observers ask about this one

How does it compare with the filter that publishes its lines?

It cannot be compared, which is the point. Without wavelengths there is no way to place two UHC filters against each other on paper, and the designation alone does not constrain what either passes.

Does a UHC filter help from a city?

On emission nebulae, yes — it removes far more artificial sky glow than nebula light. On galaxies and star clusters, which radiate across the spectrum, it removes both equally and gains nothing.